When Things Don’t Make Any Sense

I was recently asked to name my favorite book on the history of speculative bubbles in the markets. There are a number of good books on the topic, but by far my favorite is Devil Take the Hindmost: A History of Financial Speculation by Edward Chancellor (it also has one of the great investment book titles ever).

I refer to my paperback copy often. My favorite passages deal with the Japanese real estate and stock market bubble of the 1980s because I feel this had to be the biggest bubble of all-time. Some stats and anecdotes:

  • By 1990 the total Japanese property market was valued at over 2,000 trillion Yen (around $18 trillion) or 4x the real estate value of the entire U.S.
  • Grounds on the Imperial Palace were estimated to be worth more than the entire real estate sectors in California or Canada.
  • From 1956-86, land prices increased 5,000% even though consumer prices merely doubled.
  • During the 1980s, share prices in the stock market increased 3x faster than corporate profits.
  • Over 20 golf clubs cost more than $1 million to join. It cost $2.7 million to join the best golf club in Tokyo.
  • At the peak, there was a 32 square foot space in a Tokyo shopping district that sold for $600,000 even though it was far too small to build on.
  • The stock market traded at 90x corporate profits by the 1989 peak.
  • Prices in Tokyo’s best neighborhoods were 350 times more expensive than comparable spots in Manhatten.
  • In Japan’s 6 largest cities, residential real estate prices fell almost 65% from 1991 to 2005.

None of this made any sense. It was ludicrous. But these things happen because we humans almost always take these things too far.

I’m reminded of these types of crazy stats when I read something like the following from CNBC:

Thanks to one digital currency’s surge in the last few weeks, the co-founder and executive chairman of Ripple is now one of the five richest people in America.

Chris Larsen, co-founder and executive chairman of Ripple, has 5.19 billion of the company’s digital coin XRP and a 17 percent stake in the company, according to Forbes, citing sources at Ripple.

With XRP hitting a high of $3.84 on Thursday, Larsen’s holdings are worth about $59.9 billion. That puts the former Ripple CEO just ahead of Larry Ellison, who ranked fifth on Forbes 400 list with a worth of $58.4 billion. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg ranks fourth, with a worth of $74.4 billion.

Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin rank eighth and 10th on the list, respectively.

Hundreds of billions of dollars in a currency have been created basically out of thin air over the past few months. This doesn’t seem normal.

Most people who have just heard about Ripple this month likely have no idea what it is. Ripple is a payments network for banks that is supposed to allow them to send and receive transactions faster in a more secure way using blockchain technology. And it seems like the biggest use case (for now) for blockchain technology is adding it to your company’s name or mission and seeing your stock skyrocket.

First there was the Long Island Iced Tea company who literally sells beverages who changed their name to Long Blockchain and immediately saw their stock price rise by something like 500%. Then this week there was news that the owner of Hooters franchisees was starting a blockchain-based company loyalty program (um…what?) and shares spiked by over 40%.

The crazy thing with Ripple is that, as far as I can tell, the tokens (XRP) were never meant to be a cryptocurrency. XRP was simply acting as the bridge for financial institutions to perform their transactions between one another.

Also, while it sounds like there are a handful of banks that are willing to try out this process, the actual success (or failure) of the Ripple network doesn’t seem to have any bearing on the price of XRP itself. And it’s still hard to say how many banks are actually using it and in what magnitude.

It’s hard to make an apples-to-apples comparison of cryptocurrency market caps to company stock market valuations because they are measuring two completely different things. You could argue that the market caps of these protocols need to be substantial in order to do everything they’re setting out to do.

Maybe this founder will never be able to translate this wealth if it never reaches critical mass. Or maybe I’m wrong and it will become as massively successful as some hope.

Either way, it’s amazing how fast things are happening in this space. Bitcoin seems like a dinosaur at this point as it seems like new alt coins du jour are surging every other week or so.

The Japan bubble was one for the ages and this certainly isn’t even a fraction of the magnitude of that craziness. Speculative manias never follow the exact same course. Humans emotions are far too complex for that to be the case. And this says nothing about the efficacy of the technology being discussed here.

But the amount of wealth that is being created in cryptocurrencies, seemingly overnight in some cases, has all the hallmarks of history’s great manias. That doesn’t mean this stuff is going away but prices almost always detach from fundamentals when new technologies are introduced (and this one could still have a long ways to go).

When these types of moves happen in the markets it’s tempting to predict that it must be peaking and coming to an imminent end. I wouldn’t even venture a guess about how this whole thing turns out.

I do think when all is said and done we’ll be adding cryptocurrencies to the list of history’s biggest speculative manias.

(And in the interest of full disclosure I say this as someone who has cryptocurrency holdings.)

Further Reading:
How Does Something Like Bitcoin Happen?

Now here’s what I’ve been reading lately:

  • Breaking down how Amazon makes money (Visual Capitalist)
  • Pros vs. amateurs in financial services (Reformed Broker)
  • Rewriting your story (Growth Lab)
  • Is paying down debt your best investment option in 2018? (Humble Dollar)
  • Investors are like gardeners, not carpenters (Mullooly)
  • The day Robin Powell was asked to leave an investment conference (TEBI)
  • Understanding the null hypothesis (Think Newfound)
  • Hanging up your bell (Real Smartica)
  • I spent 80 days trying to get abs and it ruined my life (Vice)


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.