Do Interest Rates Matter More to the Economy or the Stock Market?

Hedge fund manager Bill Ackman is worried about the impact of rising interest rates on his portfolio:

Ackman is so concerned about rising rates impacting his portfolio, so naturally he went to the New York Fed to tell them they should…raise rates. I guess you can’t blame the guy for trying.

This was the main takeaway from his presentation:

It’s hard to argue with his conclusions here.

The economy has made substantial progress. Fiscal stimulus was rolled out on a massive scale. Interest rates do remain low by historical standards.

While the Fed has said from the beginning they won’t take their foot off the gas pedal too soon this time around, I can see why so many people are starting to worry.

Inflation is rising. Speculation is running amok. House prices are going vertical. Supply chains are constrained.

History shows Ackman’s worries about his long-only portfolio could be misplaced though. Earlier this year I looked at the relationship between rising interest rates and stock market performance:

Over the past 70 years or so the stock market has done just fine in a rising rate environment.

Obviously, there is no guarantee this relationship will remain in the future.

It’s possible the current level of rates changes the equation here. Investors could be addicted to low interest rates and become spooked at the first sign of a prolonged increase in yields.

We also could be reaching the point where interest rates now matter more to the markets than the economy.

If the Fed raises interest rates from 0% to 0.5% is that going to help restaurants hire more staff? Will that reduce supply chain bottlenecks? It’s not like the Fed can serve you IPAs and pizza or lift more containers from the backlog of oceanliners.

Total U.S. household debt is just shy of $15 trillion:

That’s a lot of money. If rates were to rise that would certainly cause a problem for any borrowers rolling over or taking on new debt.

But that $15 trillion in debt pales in comparison to the roughly $50 trillion U.S. stock market.

The only real argument for raising rates probably comes down to dampening speculation in the markets.

This probably wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world. We’ve had quite a run for the past year-and-a-half in financial assets. Risk assets aren’t supposed to simply go up all the time.

Assuming Bill Ackman is right about the Fed, there are two courses of action here:

(1) The Fed keeps its foot on the gas pedal, inflation stays elevated and markets continue to rise.

(2) The Fed takes away the punch bowl, reins in higher prices and speculation takes a breather.

The markets don’t always work this neatly as there are other potential paths forward but this seems to be the framework he’s working with.

I honestly don’t know what scenario would be worse — letting the economy run hot, thus triggering even more inflation or the Fed taking away the punch bowl early and potentially screwing up the labor and debt markets.

There are trade-offs in each scenario as well as unintended consequences.

Either way, the U.S. consumer has likely never been better positioned to handle whatever direction rates or inflation goes from here:

  • The net worth of Americans is at an all-time high.
  • Credit card debt has fallen since the start of the pandemic.
  • Housing prices are as high as they’ve ever been.
  • Home equity is at all-time records.
  • Consumers repaired their balance sheets during a pandemic-induced recession.

All of the wealth created over the past 18 months has given us an economic margin of safety that didn’t exist coming out of the 2008 crash.

Further Reading:
Economic Side Effects From the Pandemic

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.