Wealth Inequality & Lottery Tickets

While researching my last book one of the statistics that stuck with me the most was the fact that every year Americans spend more money on the lottery than they do on movie tickets, music, professional sporting events, video games, and books combined.

I also found people on the lower end of the income scale are more likely to play the lottery than people who make more money.

Bankrate found in 2018 that the lower income households in the United States spend an average of $412 annually on lottery tickets while the highest-income households spend $105 on average. And roughly one-third of people in the lowest wage group buy lottery tickets at least once a week compared with 20% of people at higher wage levels.

There are a number of behavioral biases related to our affinity for lottery ticker payouts.

Prospect theory shows people place a high value on the prospect of a low probability event occurring, assuming the outcome would drastically change their lives. Rich people wouldn’t experience the relative change from winning the lottery as much as a poor person, thus it makes sense people on the lower rungs of the income scale would play more often.

And as wealth inequality grows these lottery ticket-style behaviors are sure to increase.

Why wouldn’t you take greater risks if you have nothing to lose? Why not gamble on a low probability outcome if it has the ability to change your life?

This doesn’t makes sense from a probabilistic perspective, but it does from a psychological one.

I think prospect theory is at play when it comes to the new army of daytraders trying to take over the stock market as well.

Vox spoke to a number of new daytraders to figure out what was driving their behavior. Much of this has already been covered — people are bored, there are no sports to gamble on, the government sent out checks, the stock market has been wildly volatile, etc.

But people also see day trading as a lottery ticket if they use the right types of vehicles. One person they talked to, who lost her job during this crisis, turned to options:

“With options, you can make money so much faster. So I was then having days where I would make $1,000 a day, and then I made $10,000 in a day,” she said. “And then I started getting really cocky, and I didn’t even think I could even lose so much money. Then during the day when it was like we had a really big drop, I lost everything I had made.”

Another mentioned the fact that it’s boring to get rich slowly:

“It’s boring watching stocks, it’s not exciting, they’re not making these crazy prices,” said Adam Barker, a 31-year-old software engineer in Massachusetts. “You don’t get a rush throwing money at Berkshire Hathaway and waiting 15 years.”

I’m not saying these actions make sense. Successful investing is almost always slow and boring but our brains aren’t wired to accept slow and boring. We want exciting and explosive gains right this minute.

When things aren’t going your way, either personally or financially, it’s even more tempting to press the issue to make something happen.

As long as wealth inequality continues to get worse, there will likely be a large group of people who will place their bets on lottery tickets.

Those lottery tickets could be speculative investments. But they also may come in the form of politicians or political causes or protests.

When people have nothing to lose why wouldn’t they take a flier every once and a while?

Further Reading:
Bubble Behavior During a Depression

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.