When Correlations Go to One

There haven’t been many safe places to hide from the current market sell-off. Here are the returns through the end of the day on Tuesday for a variety of markets and styles:

Corrections III

I’m sure there are some select strategies that are holding up during this downturn, but from a traditional perspective, bonds are really the only assets treading water.

Some people assume that because nearly all risk assets fall at the same time that markets are becoming more and more intertwined with one another. While I think that globalization and the free flow of information could potentially be speeding up market cycles, risk assets have been highly correlated during stock market corrections for some time now. This is nothing new. Here are the historical numbers that show how different stock markets and market caps have performed during past large losses in the S&P 500:

Corrections II

This list includes all of the double digit losses I outlined a few days ago on the S&P 500 since 1980, along with the current correction. None of these other markets have been positive when the S&P 500 hits correction or bear market territory in the past. While some like to use these types of numbers to expose an Achilles heel of diversification, I don’t think that’s the case here. What this shows is that during market sell-offs and panics investors tend to shun all risk assets, regardless of company size or geography.

These are the times when high-quality bonds or even short-term cash equivalents finally have their day and prove their worth for inclusion in a broadly diversified portfolio. They provide not only an emotional hedge but also act as the flight to safety asset class during a market panic.

The last couple of days have unnerved and surprised a lot of investors. The wild intraday swings feel like they don’t have any place in the largest, most liquid financial markets. But this type of volatility is nothing new. In early August of 2011, the last correction we’ve seen in U.S. stocks, the market had four consecutive days with returns of -6.7%, +5.2%, -4.8% and then +4.6%. That was a little less than two months before that correction ended, so the volatility was a precursor of what was to come, not an end to the sell-off.

Volatility tends to beget more volatility in the markets (in both directions) as investors start to make rushed and panicked decisions. After a number of years of relative calm, it appears risk assets are finally living up to their name.

Further Reading:
To Win You Have to be Willing to Lose
Your Very Own Black Swan Strategy


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Simon Cunningham commented on Aug 25

    Consumer loans (p2p) fared perfectly @ 6% avg. Default rates are pegged to unemployment, which is quite low these days.

    • Ben commented on Aug 26

      This is true. It’s quite possible the economy will be outperforming the markets to play some catch up in the coming years.

  2. Jim Haygood commented on Aug 25

    Over the past 21 business days since July 28th, Consumer Staples (symbol XLP) has outperformed the S&P 500 (symbol SPY) by 1.73%, confirming its reputation as a defensive sector.

    Equal-weighted Consumer Staples (symbol RHS) outperformed SPY by 3.71% over the same period.

    In a substantial downturn, all sectors decline. But some decline less than others. For instance, the sector with worst momentum, Energy (symbol XLE), underperformed SPY by 5.41% since July 28th.

    I put a tiger in my tank … but it drowned.

    • Ben commented on Aug 26

      Also interesting that the best two sectors YTD are still consumer discretionary and healthcare. Both have been outperforming for some time. XLE down almost 40% over the past year.

      I had to look up your tiger saying…

      • Jim Haygood commented on Aug 26

        Sorry, I realized that after posting it. I feel like a grizzled old Civil War vet … ‘Yeah, sonny, I remember Bretton Woods.’

        • Ben commented on Aug 26

          It was a good one nonetheless

  3. best trading articles commented on Sep 18

    […] Carlson illustrates that in riskier times, the correlations of riskier assets can rise significantly which then reinforces the effect. Although there is not much new to learn, he validates his points […]