Forecasting Your Emotions

“People who rely heavily on forecasts seem to think there’s only one possibility, meaning risk can be eliminated if they just figure it out.” – Howard Marks

In his classic Apprenticed Investor series for, Barry Ritholtz shared his thoughts on the folly of forecasting:

Unfortunately, investors all too often give these “predictions” in print or on TV far more weight than they should. It’s very easy for a confident-sounding analyst, fund manager or professor to say something on TV that can throw off the best laid plans of investors.

The bottom line is that I’ve yet to find anyone who can accurately and consistently forecast the market behavior with any degree of accuracy, beyond short-term trend following. That inconvenient factoid never seems to dissuade the prophets — or the press — from their fortune-telling ways.

This was a great lesson for me early on in my career in the investment business. More recently, Howard Marks touched on the same topic in his latest memo:

It seems most people in the prediction business think the future is knowable, and all they have to do is be among the ones who know it. Alternatively, they may understand (consciously or unconsciously) that it’s not knowable but believe they have to act as if it is in order to make a living as an economist or investment manager.

As Marks has stated in the past, “You can’t predict. You can prepare.” As market volatility has picked up over the past couple of weeks, now is a  perfect time to consider these sentiments.

Intelligent investors understand that it’s foolish to base a process exclusively on their ability to predict the future with any certainty. It just introduces so many biases that it becomes self-defeating. Even if you know exactly what’s going to happen with the economy or geopolitical events, the markets aren’t conditional. There’s no if X happens, then Y must follow.

The challenge for investors is that you have to position your portfolio to take advantage of the future even though it’s impossible to predict. Thus, managing a portfolio with a risk target in mind as opposed to a return target is an important distinction.

No one can predict why the markets will rise and fall. There are intellectual-sounding reasons, but no one really knows why the market shrugs off some news but reacts violently to others.  The reasoning always matters less than how you react.

In many ways, investing is really about forecasting your future emotions, not predicting where interest rates or the stock market will go. You then structure your portfolio accordingly. This is why asset allocation is so important. If you know you can’t handle extreme volatility, you should own fewer stocks in your portfolio. It’s why defining your time horizon and risk profile for any investment decision matters so much.

Forecasting your emotions also means incorporating decision trigger points within your plan. Things like how and when you will make buy and sell decisions and how much of your process needs to be automated to control for bad habits.

The issue is that our risk tolerance is constantly evolving based on past experiences and the present situation. It’s much easier to predict what we would have done with the benefit of perfect hindsight than to forecast how we’ll react to a new market environment.

Some people are willing to admit their limitations and hire an advisor to help them forecast their emotions. Others are able to impose constraints on themselves to ensure good behavior.

Either way, a portfolio should be constructed take into account both your past, present and, most importantly, future tolerance for risk. That way whatever happens, you increase the odds that you’ll be able to stick with your process, whatever it may be. You’ll never be able to completely nail it. Perfect portfolios don’t exist.

Ritholtz and Marks both agree that the use of probabilities in any decision is one of the best way to manage risk because it allows you to consider different possibilities and the fact that you will be wrong at times. Hopefully this decreases the chances that you’ll be shocked or surprised by any market outcome.

In many respects, a probabilistic framework on the markets makes forecasting the future secondary to forecasting yourself.

Risk Revisited (Oaktree)
Apprenticed Investor: The Folly of Forecasting (The Street)

Now for my favorite reads of the past week:

  • Turney Duff with 10 outrageous stories of Wall Street excess (CNBC)
  • Are stocks and bonds good enough to construct a portfolio? (Reformed Broker)
  • Diversification sucks (Bason)
  • A template for the next market crash (Novel Investor)
  • The secret tool for today’s financial advisors to succeed (
  • Are you a performance taker or seeker? (Rick Ferri)
  • Your five year forecast is a joke (Big Picture)
  • Net worth is about time, not money (AARP)
  • 8 lessons from Jim Harbaugh on leadership and more (Exploring Markets)
  • The problem with long-term thinking (Morgan Housel)
  • Investment success is found in the quality of your decisions (Adam Grimes)
  • The world’s most common misconceptions (Information is beautiful)

Subscribe to receive email updates and my monthly newsletter by clicking here.

Follow me on Twitter: @awealthofcs

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Sector and Industry ETFs | Prudent Trader commented on Oct 10

    […] Irrational (Axel Merk) Forecasting Your Emotions (Wealth of Common Sense Households have finished deleveraging (Scott Grannis)) Could Your Stroke Risk Have Something to Do […]

  2. 10 Sunday Reads | The Big Picture commented on Oct 12

    […] with Wall Street, no matter how much it hurts (Next City) • Forecasting Your Emotions (A Wealth of Common Sense) • Inside the Koch Brothers’ Toxic Empire: Charles and David Koch control one of the […]

  3. 10 Sunday Reads | FAN FICTION PLANET commented on Oct 12

    […] with Wall Street, no matter how much it hurts (Next City) • Forecasting Your Emotions (A Wealth of Common Sense) • Inside the Koch Brothers’ Toxic Empire: Charles and David Koch control one of the […]

  4. John Bailey commented on Oct 14

    Of course you’re right. No one can predict either the future of the market, nor the future of his/her own situation in time. Things change, that’s the one thing we can know for sure.

    The philosopher Henri Bergson wrote books on the subject of Time & Change.

    • Ben commented on Oct 15

      Any recommendations for his best title(s)?

  5. home improvement kitchen commented on Nov 13

    Hello outstanding blog! Does running a blog such as this take a great deal of work?
    I’ve no understanding of coding however I had been hoping
    to start my own blog soon. Anyway, if you have any recommendations or techniques for new blog owners
    please share. I understand this is off topic but I
    just had to ask. Many thanks!