Something I Was Wrong About

I’ve been wrong a lot in my life.

I was wrong to think Joey Harrington and Charles Rogers were going to be the saviors for the Detroit Lions.

I was wrong when I let my brother drive my 1989 Honda Accord from Michigan to Martha’s Vineyard  to visit friends when I was in high school (it broke down immediately when he brought it back).

I was wrong to stock up on boot-cut jeans right before the slim look was about to come into fashion.

And I was wrong on this blog last year when I wrote why interest rates need to stay low for a very long time.

This was my thinking at the time:

I don’t see how the Fed or Treasury could allow interest rates to get back to 4-5% again at the current levels of debt and spending. I guess it’s possible the government would simply spend even more money but that would be a tough sell if inflation does remain elevated for some time.

Inflation may be even harder to predict than the path of interest rates so we’re in a wait-and-see economic environment but I wouldn’t be shocked if interest rates stayed relatively low for many years.

Whoops.

In that post I referenced a stat from Barron’s that said a 3% jump in government borrowing costs would send the debt service expense from a little more than $300 billion to nearly $1 trillion.1

That’s more money than we spend on defense and nearly as much as we spend on Social Security.

I assumed interest rates would have to stay low to allow the government to continue taking on our enormous debt load, especially with the trillions we added during the pandemic.

To be fair, I did give myself an out here by concluding the piece with this:

Barring a situation in which inflation gets out of control, I don’t see how they can allow rates to go much higher than 3% or so in the coming years.

However, I didn’t exactly predict 9% inflation or the ginormous amount of backlash it would receive.

Lots of people hate high levels of government debt but people seem to hate inflation even more.

In the information age it feels like we can collectively only care about one big problem at a time. That problem right now, economically speaking, is inflation.

However, if interest rates stay elevated for some time people are eventually going to take notice.

Federal debt as a percentage of GDP is already forecast to hit new all-time highs in the coming years.

My guess would be this baseline forecast does not include government borrowing costs in the 4-5% range.

A new report from The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates the most recent rate hike by the Fed will add $2.1 trillion to the government deficit over the next decade. And that’s just the most recent 0.75% raise. So that $2.1 trillion is on top of the hikes we’ve already seen this year and any further rate hikes to come.

Short-term government borrowing is already around 4% across the maturity spectrum. If the Fed tries to get short-term rates in the 4-5% range to stamp out inflation, it’s certainly possible those rates will go higher.

Maybe inflation eating into the debt offsets this somewhat but at what point do the politicians begin worrying about how much federal spending is going towards interest expenses?

At what point do citizens become concerned that other services will be harmed because so much money is being paid to service our debt?

Will higher interest rates make it politically unviable to invest in things like our infrastructure?

Am I doubling down on my wrong take here?

A Martingale strategy is when you keep upping your bet after losing to try to make your money back. I had a friend who used to do this at the blackjack table, simply doubling his bet every time he lost.1

Should I double down here?

Maybe this is just a short-term burst in rates that comes back down once we tame inflation. Maybe the pressure point on the government will change from inflation to debt.

It does feel like there are still a lot of long-term factors in place that should keep a lid on interest rates — demographics, the number of retirees seeking income, technological progress, etc.

The monkey wrench here would be if inflation stays elevated for an extended period of time. If inflation stays high you would assume rates would have to stay high as well.

If that happens the interest expense could become the next hot-button political talking point.

Michael and I talked about the impact of the Fed’s rate hikes and more on this week’s Animal Spirits:

Subscribe to The Compound so you never miss an episode.

Further Reading:
Do We Need to Worry About Government Debt?

Now here’s what I’ve been reading lately:

1The problem with this strategy is, of course, eventually you can run out of money. It rarely worked out for him after multiple trips to the ATM.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.