The New Fed Mandate: Full Employment & Asset Bubbles?

As recently as the 1990s, investors were forced to guess what the Federal Reserve was going to do next based on the width of Alan Greenspan’s briefcase.1

Communication from the Fed is still relatively new, maybe two decades old.

The 2008 crisis brought the Fed into the information age as Bernanke and company upped their communication game.

If that crisis was the Fed dipping their toe into the sharing age, the pandemic has turned them into your annoying friend on Instagram who shares “the most beautiful sunset in the world” every single night.

Like it or not, the Fed is extremely direct about what they plan on doing these days.

In recent weeks the Fed has made it clear they have no intention of raising interest rates anytime soon. They have an inflation target of 2% but are willing to ignore that benchmark in the interest of allowing the employment situation to markedly improve first.

The Fed’s dual mandate is price stability and maximizing employment.

They have made it clear the former isn’t as big of a worry as the latter. The Fed doesn’t necessarily control the economy but this shift in priorities will certainly have an impact on the markets and economy, whether it’s real or perceived.

I have a lot of questions:

  • Can the Fed will the economy to a faster recovery this time around versus the last recovery?
  • Will Congress get the message here that the Fed is begging them to spend more money with rates on the floor for years?
  • How low will borrowing costs get?
  • How much will people borrow in the years ahead?
  • Will low rates keep the housing market rocking for an extended period?
  • With rates as these levels for a long time are we setting up for the mother of all asset bubbles?
  • What happens if we actually get inflation? Will the Fed change their mind?
  • How long will rates stay low for? Maybe this entire decade?
  • Just because the Fed is comfortable with higher inflation, what if they don’t get it?
  • What if inflation is so difficult to measure that it’s a useless statistic for the Fed to track in the first place?

Michael and I discussed some of these questions and more on this week’s podcast:

I wish I knew the answers to these questions but the fact that the Fed is being so much more open about their intentions has to at the very least have psychological implications for investors.

Further Reading:
What If We Get Inflation But Interest Rates Don’t Rise?

Now here’s what I’ve been reading lately:

1The theory of Greenspan’s briefcase was if it was full, it meant a rate cut was coming because he needed more evidence to back up the move. If it wasn’t full, that meant no action would be taken. The 90s were a simpler time.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.