The Flying V-Shaped Recoveries

Back in March during the height of the stock market sell-off, I wrote about how long it has taken historically to make your money back following a bear market:

The average breakeven to make a round trip from peak-to-trough-back-to-peak has been around 26 months.

The fastest breakeven going back to the 1920s for a bear market of 30% or worse was in 1932-1933 when it took just 3 months for a full roundtrip. The breakeven for the current bear market happened in just under 6 months, making it the second-fastest on record:

After peaking in late-February, the S&P 500 reached a new high this week when you include dividends.1

So we just experienced the fastest 30% bear market from all-time highs in history along with the second-fastest recovery from a 30% bear market in history.

The market lost roughly 34% from late-February through late-March and then proceeded to gain more than 52% to make it all back. It took just 23 trading days on the way down and 97 on the way back up.

The V-shape of the market this year is staggering, especially since it occurred during a global pandemic that the United States still doesn’t have under control.

Volatility in the stock market is nothing new but the speed of both the decline and the recovery is enough to make your head spin.

A similar V-shaped recovery took place after the correction in late-2018:

The S&P 500 fell nearly 20% from late-September through Christmas Eve of 2018. It then took just 4 months to make those losses back.

There’s an argument to be made that market cycles like this will only continue to happen at a breakneck pace in the future.

The Great Depression stock market crash technically lasted 4 years or so but the effects from that downturn lasted a generation. On a price basis, the stock market didn’t reach the 1929 highs until the 1950s. On a total return basis, it took nearly a decade-and-a-half.

If this pandemic and economic shutdown would have occurred prior to the 2008 crisis, I’m guessing the stock market would have fallen a minimum of 50% to 60%.

The Great Recession planted the seed for a larger, faster response from the Fed and other government officials. This situation has certainly benefited from what we learned during 2008. The Fed becomes more intertwined with the markets with every passing crisis and it’s going to be next to impossible to retract their tentacles from the functioning of the financial system.

We also have technology speeding up the flow of information and breaking down the barriers to entry in the markets.

There are still many investors who don’t understand the nature of the markets has likely changed for the foreseeable future.

“I’ve seen this movie before and…” No you haven’t. Not like this.

Human nature remains the one constant as always but the combination of technology and government intervention means the response may not be what it once was.

Investors are now trained to buy when markets fall because they “always” come back.

It will probably take an extended bear market with multiple legs down to break the will of investors to change this line of thinking.

And I’m not saying we’ve outlawed market crashes. I actually think they’ll be more frequent going forward, just smaller & shorter than they would’ve been in the past.

Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe there will a new Fed chair that screws things up. Maybe there will be a crisis where we get hit from 10 different angles.

But it feels to me like things are going to be sped up for some time from crashes to central bank response time to market recoveries.

Further Reading:
How Long Does It Take to Make Your Money Back After a Bear Market

1On a price basis it’s still a few points short but close enough. The S&P 500 closed at 3,386.15 on February 19. On Friday, it closed at 3.372.85. Close enough.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.