Nothing Fails Quite Like Success in the Stock Market

A reader sent me an old piece I wrote in early-2014 that contained a stat that made me do a double-take:

The energy sector outperformed the S&P 500 by nearly 7% per year with nearly the same standard deviation.

This seems almost impossible to believe at the moment. Oil prices went negative this year. Energy stocks are in a death spiral. Were they really the top dog as recently as 2014?

That piece was about the returns to various sectors in the S&P 500 so I went back and looked at the performance of the new king of the hill — tech stocks — in relation to energy names back then.

The State Street SPDR sector ETFs were released in January 1999. These are the total returns for energy, technology and the S&P 500 from that inception date through the end of 2013:

This may be a cherry-picked starting point because it coincides closely with the bursting of the dot-com bubble but the numbers are the numbers. For a 15-year period, energy stocks absolutely smoked technology stocks and the broader S&P 500 and it wasn’t even close.

Now here are the results from the end of 2013 to now:

Everyone knows what happened since then. Oil crashed, tech stocks took off like a rocket ship and they haven’t looked back since.

And as great at the returns were for energy stocks from 1999-2013, the pullback ever since then has led to massive underperformance since inception:

The tech stock resurgence has erased 15 years of underperformance with the S&P 500 so they’re now neck-and-neck.

Right now it feels like mega-caps tech stocks will hold the throne forever. They were not only gaining market share leading up to the crisis but have been some of the biggest beneficiaries of what’s transpired so far in this debacle.

If anything, these companies are now stronger than ever.

Would you bet against Amazon, Apple or Google right now?

Maybe these companies continue to gobble up the stock market but history is littered with examples of huge companies that go on to underperform the market once they create an outsized position.

Jim Bianco shared a great chart of the largest company in the S&P 500 by year going back to the 1960s:

Most people probably didn’t realize the stock market was actually more concentrated in the past than it is today. AT&T and IBM were almost 10% of the index back in the 1960s.

You can see from the graph those two names were at the top for a long time in the 1960s and 1970s. In more recent decades the turnover among the biggest names has increased.

Take General Electric as an example. The massive conglomerate was the biggest company in the market for much of the 1990s and early-2000s. The last year it held the crown was 2005. Here are the returns for GE since then:

It’s painful to think about all of the retirement portfolios that have been ruined for employees of the company who held an outsized position in GE.

Exxon was the biggest stock in the market as recently as 2011. Here are the returns since then:

This is not surprising when you look at the returns of the energy sector as a whole.

IBM was the largest stock through 1989:

The company held up relatively well for a number of years but is now underperforming the S&P 500 by more than 200% since 1989.

Microsoft is one of the more resilient stocks on this list. It was the top name in 2002 and then again in 2020 but it wasn’t until the end of 2016 that it finally caught up to the performance of the index before making another impressive run at the top spot:

To be fair, I’m looking at the performance for these stocks from their peak. No one ever knows that in advance and many of these companies stayed at the top for a number of years.

But the history of the markets shows nothing lasts forever.

From the Nifty Fifty stocks of the early-1970s to commodities in the late-1970s to energy stocks in the early-1980s to Japanese stocks in the late-1980s to dot-com stocks in the late-1990s to real estate in the mid-2000s to emerging markets in the 2010s nothing fails like success in the markets.

It would be foolish to predict the demise of tech companies at the moment. They are proving to be one of the few bright spots in an otherwise awful crisis. The performance of tech stocks actually makes sense right now.

But the stocks of these companies will overshoot at some point. Investors always take things too far by baking in expectations their investments can’t possibly hope to live up to when things are going well.

Tech stocks will come back to earth and be replaced by something else eventually. The hard part of this equation is knowing when that eventuality takes place.

Investors have been waiting years for the biggest stocks in the stock market to falter and they’ve done just the opposite.

I see only three choices when thinking through how this all plays out:

(1) Beat your head against the wall and avoid these companies (or short them) like many value investors have done in recent years.

(2) Concentrate your money in tech stocks and hope they continue to outperform.

(3) Own a broadly diversified universe of stocks such that you can somewhat take advantage of any further upside appreciation in tech stocks but not be hurt too badly if they stumble.

Choose your fighter wisely.

Further Reading:
The Collapse of the Energy Sector

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.