The Most Important Retirement Fund Right Now

There’s never been a better time to be an individual investor. Fees and commissions continue to drop. There are more options than ever for investment products, strategies and fund structures. And there’s an unbelievable amount of quality research and commentary about saving, investing, retirement and the markets available for free.

Two of the most heavily covered topics in this area are index funds and robo-adviors. There’s another one that doesn’t get nearly enough attention considering how important it is as a retirement savings vehicle — the target date retirement fund.

The main reason TDFs are so important to retirement savers is because of a rule change in the Pension Reform Act of 2006 which requires workplace retirement plans to provide a legitimate default investment option for their employees who sign up. In the past, most of these plans would default to a fixed income or stable value fund. Most people don’t know how to pick their own funds or rarely make changes to their investment options, so this made it difficult for people to know where to begin when they started saving.

TDFs were named as an acceptable default option which has caused enormous growth in these funds ever since. In a recent report on TDFs from Vanguard, they outlined how this change to a default option has affected the retirement savings market as 88% of all plan sponsors now offer these funds, with 64% of participants on Vanguard’s platform using them.

Here are a few more stats on the TDF space courtesy of my pal Jeff Ptak of Morningstar:

  • As of November 30, there is roughly $772 billion in TDFs.
  • Three fund families control over 70% of the TDF market (Vanguard – 29.2%, Fidelity – 23.9% and T. Rowe Price – 17.3%).
  • 70% of TDFs are actively managed while 30% are passively managed (which is basically the same exact split in the overall fund industry).
  • At the end of 2014, TDF’s made up around 8% of total mutual fund assets, but compromised 30% of net new inflows.
  • The average expense ratio is 0.78%.
  • Alternative investments are becoming increasingly common in TDFs.
  • Not all TDFs are created equal as you can see from the wide range of returns in the different fund classes:
Screen Shot 2016-01-02 at 11.01.03 PM
  • As life expectancies continue to climb, some worry that TDFs don’t hold enough stocks for retirees. Here is the average glide path for these funds over time:
Screen Shot 2016-01-02 at 11.12.23 PM

TDFs aren’t perfect. You can’t customize these funds to suit your exact needs or asset allocation preferences. There’s no one there to hold your hand or explain exactly how these funds work (retirement advice varies by plan sponsor and is often severely lacking). Many TDFs are filled with a collection of high fee funds. The allocations and glide paths for allocation changes vary among the various TDFs.

And it’s not just the default investment option that’s causing the massive growth in the space as half of all individuals in these plans who are in TDFs are doing so with their own investment choices. I’ve had countless people over the past few years tell me they have no idea what they’re doing when trying to manage their retirement assets so they simply chose a TDF to simplify the selection process. As with all strategies, you’ll always be able to do better, but it’s much easier to do worse.

This is one of the under-rated aspects of these funds. It’s one fund (really, a fund of funds). If nothing else, it’s a great way for investors who are just starting out to gain exposure to a diversified portfolio without having to figure out the specific holdings themselves. TDFs make for a great starter fund. The fund company does all of the rebalancing for you. They choose the funds. They make asset allocation changes over time.

TDFs aren’t made for high net worth individuals or those looking to actively manage their portfolios. But for the most part they are a great option for the average individual investor who doesn’t have any other options or sources of financial advice.

As financial nudges become more prevalent in trying to help people save more for retirement my guess is the default investment option will become a very competitive marketplace. I wouldn’t be surprised to see ETF providers, financial advisor model portfolios and robo-advisors make a huge push in this area in the future. Until then, it appears TDFs have the market cornered. The average retirement saver would be wise to pay attention to these funds to better understand what they are investing in.

Creating a viable default investment option for retirement savers was a great first step in improving things for those who are clueless about investing or those who want to simplify their savings strategy. I’ll be interested to see how this evolves in the coming years and decades to see how much we can improve the retirement system, which is badly in need of some help.

2015 Target-Date Fund Landscape (Morningstar)
From the Mind of the TDF Investor (Vanguard)

Further Reading:
The Four Pillars of Retirement Savings


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. kris commented on Jan 04

    Why do you say . . . “TDFs aren’t made for high net worth individuals” ?

    • Ben commented on Jan 04

      my experience has been that these are mostly starter funds and HNW investors would typically prefer a more personalized portfolio. That’s not to say they couldn’t utilize a TDF, but my guess is most don’t want to use them.

      • Grant commented on Jan 04

        Yes, I think you are right, most HNW individuals don’t want TDFs, but I think that’s maybe because they get wined and dined by expensive wealth managers. The irony is they would likely be better off with TDFs.

  2. MG commented on Jan 04

    Ben, thanks for getting the comments section back up and running. Kudos to your software person.

    I think this is an excellent summation of TDFs. As a HNW and self-managed investor I have no need for a TDF; if asked I would suggest that a novice investor simply buy the VTI and a medium term bond fund in the allocation appropriate for them, so that they have more ability to tailor the risk and return outcome. But you are correct that even that is too sophisticated for many people, and for them TDFs are superior to the old guaranteed income fund or money market default.