Don’t Let Janet Yellen Control Your Retirement Portfolio

“Far too many investors fail to understand that the strategy to get rich (take risks) is entirely different from the strategy to stay rich (minimize risks, diversify the risks you take, and don’t spend too much).” – Larry Swedroe

Ever since the Fed lowered short-term interest rates to essentially 0% during the financial crisis, there has been an argument made by many that ‘The Fed is levying a tax on retired savers that need income from savings accounts or CDs.’

I get the gist of this argument. Investors yearn for the days when they were able to get 4-5% interest rates in bank CDs. A 5 year CD today pays close to 2% annually which is hardly enough to keep up with inflation.

For those investors that have relied exclusively on savings accounts and CDs to fund their retirement, lower interest rates have been a problem.

However, it’s not technically savers that are being targeted.  What the Fed has really been punishing is risk aversion.

Those that have invested their savings in the financial markets have done quite well since the Fed lowered its short-term interest rate target in late 2008.

But over the long-term risk aversion has always been punished, if not by the Fed, then by inflation. Real returns on cash going back to the late 1920s are under 0.5% per year.

What many retirees fail to realize is that you have multiple time horizons for your retirement portfolio. You have a very long runway to save before you retire, which could be up to 40 years or more.

Then you have another 20-35 years during retirement where you still need to beat inflation for spending needs (and maybe even longer if you plan on leaving money to your heirs).

Obviously, your risk profile is much different when you have a large portfolio at retirement than it is when you first start out, but it doesn’t mean you need to shun risk altogether. You just have to take it in smaller doses depending on your circumstances.

Let’s say you are a risk averse retiree that carries 4 years’ worth of expenses in cash. If you follow the 4% rule of thumb for withdrawals, that would be 16% of your portfolio in a money market account.

Assuming you have a portfolio mix of 50% in stocks and 50% in bonds/cash, a potential simple portfolio could look like this:


The Fed didn’t really cut rates close to 0% until the end of 2008, but I extended a back test of results on this portfolio to the beginning of 2008 to include a huge loss in the markets for the sake of comparison.

Here are the returns on this hypothetical portfolio:

retiree 1

These results are aided by the bull market in stocks, but you can see that in 2008 there was a fairly large loss.

That’s the type of year your cash and bonds come in handy for spending and rebalancing purposes (total bond funds were up roughly 5% in ’08). In the big stock return years you use those gains for living expenses and risk control.

You can see that our hypothetical retiree was not penalized by the Fed because they were a saver. They were helped out by being an investor.

Even if the Fed hadn’t locked interest rates in the basement and they had been 2% higher over this period, that still would have only added 0.3% to your total annual return.  This is only $300 per $100,000 in your portfolio.

Not a huge tax by any means.

Because of our ingrained aversion to loss or a misunderstanding of the dynamics of the financial markets, it seems that many retirees are under the impression that they can never touch their principal balance to use for spending needs.

Many see income as the only way to prosper in retirement.  Growth of principal probably won’t be your main goal at that point, but it should continue to play a role.

I’m not an interest rate soothsayer. They can and probably should go up, but they don’t have to.  It could take a long time.

Remember that there are never completely risk-free ways to grow your money.

In the financial markets, you are at the risk of losing temporary capital to depressed prices. In cash, you are at risk of losing permanent capital to inflation.

A good balance of these two risks should help you through the inevitable ups and downs in the markets and ensure you have enough money for expenses.


Follow me on Twitter: @awealthofcs

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web