How Many Stocks Outperform the Stock Market?


A reader asks:

Could you talk about what percentage of stocks that are beating the S&P over the last 5 years also beat the S&P the 5 years before that? I’m curious what names appear in both lists, with factors like pre- and post-COVID, and pre- and post-AI playing a factor. Maybe you could also talk about how stocks that beat the S&P over a 5-year window tend to fare over the next 5 years on average.

This is a good question because so many investors are concerned about concentration in the S&P 500.

It sure feels like it should be a small number of stocks that have outperformed.

In the 5 year period from 2016-2020, the S&P 500 was up a little more than 100%. From 2021 through this week, the S&P 500 is now up around 90% in total.

Those are both very good returns at right around 14%-15% annually.

So how many stocks outperformed in these 5 year windows?

The number was higher than I thought it would be.

There is a caveat here that stocks have moved into and out of the index over this period. The turnover isn’t that high in the S&P 500 but it’s probably 2-4% per year on average.

By my calculations, 149 stocks outperformed the index in the five years ending 2020. That’s around 30% of the total. That’s a fairly low number.

In the last 5 years, 241 stocks outperformed the S&P 500’s return. That’s more like 50% of the total. That’s not bad.

So how many outperformed over both periods?

I counted 40 stocks.

Here is a list of the tickers for those stocks:

It’s a lot of names you know — Microsoft, Google, Nvidia, Walmart, JP Morgan, Costco and Broadcom. Nvidia’s results were off the charts good in both time periods, up 1,500% and 1,300%, respectively.

Some surprising names outperformed in each 5 year period as well — Hilton, Caterpillar and Deckers Outdoors to name a few.

The stock market is getting more and more concentrated at the top but the number of stocks that outperform the index each year is probably higher than you think. Here’s a look at the number of stocks that have outperformed the index performance each year going back to 1990:

The average is just shy of 50% of the total each year.

It’s interesting that it’s basically a coin flip each year on whether you’ll outperform or not with individual securities.

The win rate for outperforming stocks goes down to roughly one-third over the previous 10, 15 and 20 year time frames.

Even with a 50% annual win rate, picking stocks is not easy. But picking the stock-pickers that outperform the market is even harder.

Each year SPIVA updates its Persistence Scorecard to see how many professional fund managers are able to outperform in successive multi-year periods.

The numbers are dreadful.

Take a look at this chart:

Around 2% of all large cap funds were able to remain in the top half of returns for their category in 5 straight years. It gets even worse the further out you go.

SPIVA notes that zero funds that were in the top quartile as of December 2020 remained in the top quartile over the ensuing 4 years. None of the top quartile funds from 2022 were in the top quartile over the next two years. Not one.

And of course, the number of funds that outperform over the long run is tiny as well:

Over 15 and 20 years just 10% or so of all actively managed funds outperform.

Outperforming is hard. Outperforming consistently is basically unheard of these days.

If you’re going to invest actively, you need to be prepared for lumpy returns, even for the small number of funds and investors who do outperform.

I think one of the reasons the win rate for the number of outperforming stocks is higher than the win rate for fund outperformance is that buy-and-hold is a difficult strategy to stick with psychologically.

Picking the winning stocks is hard but staying invested in them might be even harder.

Buy-and-hold is probably your best bet when owning individual stocks but it’s not easy to sit on your hands and wait.

I answered this question in detail on this week’s all new Ask the Compound:

We also discussed questions about how to die with zero, how diversification works in practice, the Dave Ramsey portfolio and when to make your 529 account more diversified and conservative.

Further Reading:
When Buy-and-Hold Dies

 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.