A Short History of Money Market Funds

Vanguard’s first index fund hit the market in the summer of 1976.

It was a complete bust, raising just over $11 million in capital from investors. John Bogle had dreams of raising $150 million.

That fund was so small, in fact, that Vanguard’s initial S&P 500 Index Fund could only buy 280 of the biggest, most representative stocks to create the index. Any more than that and the costs would have been too large.

And right out of the gate, the index showed disappointing performance, underperforming around three-quarters of all actively managed mutual funds from 1977-1982.

By 1981, Vanguard held just 5.8% of mutual fund industry assets. That number dropped to 5.2% by 1985 and 4.1% by 1987. Their most popular fund series, the Wellington Funds, saw 83 consecutive months of outflows, equal to $500 million or one-third of the initial assets in the firm when it was founded.

Vanguard was hemorrhaging money.

Their one saving grace was the most boring fund on the planet — the money market fund.

According to the Investment Company Institute, there is now close to $4.7 trillion in money market assets. Yet these cash equivalent funds didn’t exist until the 1970s.

The first money market fund, called the Reserve Fund, was created in 1971. At the time, banks were capped on the amount of yield they could pay out in a savings account at 5.25% per year. Through the use of short-term treasury bills and commercial paper, money market funds were able to offer much juicier yields, in the 8-9% range, which were more reflective of prevailing rates at the time.

Every other fund company immediately copied this idea. Assets in money markets ballooned from $4 billion in 1977 to $185 billion in 1981. It probably helped that interest rates were much higher back then.

Vanguard started its first money market fund in 1975. Index funds would have become popular either way but the money market fund definitely kept the firm, and frankly, most of the mutual fund industry afloat in the late-1970s and 1980s.

Here’s what Bogle had to say about the importance of money market funds to his firm in Stay the Course:

Throughout the decade of the 1980s, I often bragged to our crew about Vanguard’s spectacular growth, in part to maintain and build on the solid morale we had established. But in reality, our growth largely reflected the growth of the burgeoning fund industry. During that decade, mutual fund assets lept from $241 billion to $1.45 trillion. The charge was led by money market funds, which soared from $2 billion to $570 billion, accounting for almost half the increase.

Bogle saw the firm’s assets rise from $1.5 billion in 1974 to $4.1 billion by 1981, thanks in large part to the growth in money market funds.

Boring old money market funds kept Vanguard afloat long enough to allow index funds some runway to take off. The rest is history as Vanguard now manages something like $7 trillion.

Which brings me to stablecoins.

The Block reported last week total stablecoin supply has now passed $100 billion:

Most of the growth has taken place this year, as there was just $30 billion as of the start of 2021.

A stablecoin is simply a cryptocurrency that is backed by reserves. So you get all of the benefits of the blockchain without the volatility of bitcoin and other cryptos. You can loosely think of stabelcoins as the money market fund of crypto, with the risk profile of high yield debt.

Tether is by far the biggest stablecoin with a 62% share, which worries some people. Bloomberg had a recent piece calling for the regulation of these coins:

But stablecoins like Tether face no such constraints. There is no U.S. legal framework for regulating them. There are no requirements on how reserves must be invested, nor any requirements for audits or reporting.

If some of Tether’s investments were to become worthless or decline in value, it would suffer the equivalent fate of breaking the buck. And if, for any reason, a wave of Tether holders suddenly tried to convert their tokens to cash, we do not know whether Tether could liquidate sufficient investments quickly to satisfy the demand.

There is a huge amount of risk involved and stablecoins will probably have some hiccups along the way but I think they could end up being a toe in the water for those who are still unsure about putting their money into crypto.

Michael and I discussed stablecoins vs. money market funds and more on this week’s Animal Spirits (check out the new intro):

Subscribe to The Compound for more of these videos.

Further Reading:
What I Learned From Jack Bogle

Now here’s what I’ve been reading lately:

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.