Are Emerging Markets Turning Into the S&P 500?

The S&P 500 has crushed all competition for some time now. Small cap stocks, value stocks, foreign stocks, emerging market stocks — none of them have been able to keep up with the mega-cap dominance of the S&P 500.

Here is the performance of the S&P 500 versus emerging market stocks since the start of 2007:

It’s not even close.

There are many reasons for this outperformance. The dollar has strengthened mightily since the Great Recession. Emerging markets also dominated the S&P for the majority of the first part of the 2000s.

Another reason many investors harp on is the sector differences between the United States and foreign stock markets. They say these differences help explain the large valuation gap between these markets:

Emerging markets are cheaper on every metric. Many investors say this makes sense considering emerging markets are full of energy, materials, and financials while the U.S. is more driven by technology and consumer stocks.

And this was a good argument in 2007 or even 2015 but not so in 2020.

The make-up of emerging market equities has changed dramatically in recent years. Blackrock sent me the sector changes in their iShares Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) since 2007:

Here are some notable changes since the start of 2007:

  • Energy has gone from more than 15% to less than 6%
  • Materials were closer to 16% and now sit at 7%
  • Financials have gone from more than 20% to 18% (and are down from a high of 27% in 2015)
  • Consumer discretionary stocks have gone from roughly 3% to 18%
  • Technology is now the biggest sector, having risen from 13% in 2007 to more than 18% now

Financials still have a large weighting but it’s a dwindling market share compared to the past. Energy and materials companies combined are now less than either of those categories were individually in 2007. And technology stocks now make up the largest sector in the fund.

Here are the sector comparisons versus the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) as of the end of July:

There are still differences here (mainly in healthcare) and of course the individual companies themselves are not the same but this looks a lot closer than things did in the past. And by far the biggest changes are in the tech and consumer sectors.

One of the main reasons the overall U.S. stock market has done so well is the monstrous performance of the giant tech stocks. Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Facebook and Google currently make up around 23% of the S&P 500.

Emerging markets now have a similar tech concentration at the top. These are the top 10 holdings in EEM:

The sector labels can be confusing because the lines are now blurred between the consumer, communication and technology segments of the market but the top 4 holdings are all basically tech stocks in EM and they make up 23% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.1

In many ways, Alibaba, Tencent, Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung are to emerging markets what Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook and Google are to the U.S.

Now, I’m not saying emerging market stocks deserve a similar multiple to the S&P 500. There are other factors at play here including rule of law, the maturity of the financial markets, trust in the financial system, the autonomy of corporations in various countries and how shareholders are treated by regulators and government officials.

But things have drastically changed over the years in emerging markets and many investors may not know this because their shares have lagged so badly.

It’s also worth noting the cyclical nature of the relationship between these markets over time:

These start and end dates are cherry-picked but they are the numbers nonetheless. And despite the vast differences in performance depending on the cycle, the returns in the overall period are nearly identical — 10.7% per year for the S&P 500 and 10.4% for the MSCI EM Index since 1988.

So maybe investors don’t care as much about the sectors as the other factors involved when investing in developing markets.

But emerging markets are starting to look more like the S&P 500 over time. Eventually, that should be a good thing for investors in these volatile markets.

Further Reading:
Which Investments Benefit From a Weaker Dollar?

1For example, Amazon is considered a consumer discretionary company. Facebook is classified as a communication services company. Apple is tech but could easily be consumer discretionary.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.