Where the Magic Happens in the Stock Market

Apple is up a lot over the past year, more than doubling in terms of total returns:

Some investors claim the only reason Apple share have risen so much must be due to a combination of inflows into passive investment products and share buybacks from the company. Index funds and buybacks have made for a nice scapegoat the past few years but these theories don’t hold water when you look at the actual numbers.

CNBC recently ran a story about this topic where tech analyst Tony Sacconaghi refutes these theories:

However, Sacconaghi points out that flows into passive vehicles were not as strong in 2019 as in previous years, yet Apple still rallied. Equity ETFs saw just over $97 billion in inflows last year while equity funds still had net outflows. He added that about $3 billion in passive money shifted into Apple last year, “which is relatively small in the context of the company’s $1.3T+ valuation.”

“Our analysis doesn’t point to compelling evidence that AAPL’s strength over the last year has been attributable to either buybacks or other technical factors such as the migration to passive,” Sacconaghi said. “Instead, investors’ view that fundamentals are improving – warranting a better multiple – appears to be the key driver of appreciation.”

Michael and I discussed this story and shared our own theories as to how one of the biggest stocks in the world could experience such a surge:

My theory as to why Apple has skyrocketed over the past year was mostly a joke.

But maybe I was only half kidding.

Look at the price-to-earnings ratio over the past year for the stock:

Like the stock itself, the valuation is up well over 100%. And it’s not just PE ratio. Price-to-sales, price-to-free cash flow, and price-to-book have also doubled or more over the past year:

When valuations rise in concert with the stock you can’t necessarily point to improving fundamentals as the reason for a stock’s rise.

If we compare revenue and earnings numbers from September 2018 to September 2019, they are actually slightly lower through the 3rd quarter of last year:

Obviously, these results are backward-looking. Stock prices are (supposed to be) forward-looking. Stock prices are supposed to equate to the future cash flows of a company discounted back at a reasonable rate of interest.

But over any 12 month period there’s no way this is how the majority of investors are thinking about stock prices.

It is almost magic when investors bid up your stock prices and valuations when there’s no true catalyst.

Over the past year investors have simply decided they are willing to pay 26x Apple’s current earnings when last year they were only willing to pay 13x. The reason I consider this magic is because it’s not something you can model out in the fundamentals.

A discounted cash flow analysis cannot gauge the emotions of investors. And that’s all changes in valuations are in the short-term. Fundamentals aren’t driving stocks over such short time frames.

Apple’s market cap has gone from roughly $720 billion to well over $1.3 trillion in just 12 months. Have the fundamentals or future prospects of the company really changed that much over the past year? To the tune of three-quarters of a trillion dollars in market cap gains?

Not really.

But investors believe the company is worth that much more at the moment so that’s what it’s worth.

The other side of this, of course, is when investors lose faith or lower their expectations in a stock and hammer the valuation and price because of it.

What’s the opposite of magic? Harsh realities?

Eventually investors will see the other side of this magic but at the moment things are pretty good for stock market investors.

I don’t know what Apple should be worth but it always boggles my mind that one of the biggest, most heavily followed stocks on the planet can see such a massive re-pricing for no good reason other than investors changed their minds.

Feels pretty magical to me.

Further Reading:
Where Have All the Stock Market Returns Come From This Decade?

Now here’s what I’ve been reading lately:

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.