Retail Venture Capitalists

A couple of years ago, Tadas Viskanta of Abnormal Returns asked myself and a handful of other bloggers the following question in his finance blogger wisdom series:

Uber just raised VC monies at a $17 billion valuation. Are the private markets the new public markets? Is the average investor missing out on his/her inability to meaningfully participate in the private/pre-public stages?

This was my response:

Average investors have a hard enough time dealing with periodic losses in the stock market. Venture capital investors are often looking for 1-2 home runs in a portfolio of 20 or so private investments. Roughly 75% of all start-up companies fail and seeing an investment go to zero would be far too difficult for the majority of individuals to handle for the slight possibility of finding one or two big winners. We really only hear about the private company success stories and forget about all of the failed ventures it took to get to that one big winner. Average investors are better off sticking to the public markets.

Many investors assume that the stock market is rigged (in some ways it is, but it’s always been rigged). In the private markets, especially the venture capital industry, the markets basically are rigged in favor of a small group of funds and investors. They have access to deals, entrepreneurs and investment opportunities that the majority of other investors do not. And because the VC industry is relatively small in comparison to other markets, there’s not always enough to go around in terms of the best deals and returns. This is why the same VC firms are almost always the best performers every cycle (and good luck getting into those funds).

As Tadas alluded to the success of certain VC-funded companies — and the fact that they have all been staying private for much longer than they once did — gave many retail investors the sense that they were missing out. Fear of missing out is never a great investment strategy, but watching someone else get rich under the assumption that it’s easy is a very seductive line of reasoning.

Thanks to a few mutual fund companies the retail investor has gotten a shot to partake in some of these VC deals. They tend to be small positions in the overall funds, but firms such as Fidelity and T. Rowe Price have added some venture deals to certain funds they manage. VC Mark Suster of Upfront Ventures recently detailed some of the latest performance numbers courtesy of Fidelity:

Screen Shot 2016-03-02 at 3.43.40 PM

It hasn’t been pretty as many unicorns have come back down to earth.

But surely some of the venture-backed companies that eventually went public have done pretty well, right? Unless you invested in Facebook, most of the IPOs in venture land have also had a rough time. Here are the numbers from Charlie Bilello:

Screen Shot 2016-03-01 at 4.30.14 PM

This isn’t an indictment of the VC world. Many of the early investors in these companies still did extremely well. But individuals have to remember that venture capital investing in predicated on the fact that the majority of the companies that they invest in will go bust, but the few that work will be home runs. Finding those companies as an individual and getting a seat at the table is nearly impossible.

A few takeaways:

  • If an investment opportunity sounds too good to be true it probably is.
  • If you’re being sold “access” to top funds as a retail investor, run in the other direction as fast as you can. You’re getting table scraps after everything has already been picked over by institutional investors with the potential for an additional layer or two of fees.
  • You don’t have to be invested in everything. It’s okay to miss out on investment trends whether they end up doing well or not.
  • The fear of missing out is a difficult feeling to shake as an investor, so it helps to remember that opportunity cost is much cheaper than losing your shirt on a terrible investment.

Upfront VC Analysis 2016

Further Reading:
Chris Sacca on the Power of Incentives

Now here’s what I’ve been reading this week:

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. mikedariano commented on Mar 04

    Ben, DHH was on the Tropical MBA podcast talking about VC, and he adds the “color commentary” to the “play by play” that you describe. Might be another data point for you.

    • Ben commented on Mar 04

      Never heard of that one before. Will take a look. Thanks.

  2. WEEKEND! commented on Mar 04

    This all comes back to knowing what your personal financial goals are. You might not require that home run return (and associated risk), accepting public market returns might fill your needs just fine. And if you do require a home run, then you had better address some of your fundamental financial decisions first (e.g. saving).

    To further the baseball analogy, a homerun with the bases loaded scores more runs than a single blast into the bleachers. The runners on base got there by hitting singles, grounders, and even not swinging.

    • Ben commented on Mar 04

      Good point. I agree. Need to take risk is a big one most people have a hard time grasping.