6 Reasons For David Swensen’s Success at Yale

In my book I devoted an entire chapter to the institutional investment world because that’s where I’ve spent my time in this business over the years. Many of those pages were devoted to Yale’s David Swensen, who I described as the Warren Buffett of institutional investing.

Swensen wrote the bible on how to think about the many challenges of creating a successful institutional investment office in his book, Pioneering Portfolio Management: An Unconventional Approach to Institutional Investment.

The foreword to the book was written by legendary investment author and consultant Charley Ellis, who has witnessed Swensen’s performance firsthand by sitting on the endowment fund’s investment committee for a number of years. Ellis used his foreword to lay out six reasons for Swensen’s enviable track record, which now spans a multi-decade period.

I thought his reasons provide an interesting perspective on what it takes to create not only a successful investment office, but a successful organizational culture in general. Here they are with a mixture of quotes from Ellis and some paraphrasing on my part:

1. An evidence-based decision-making process. Ellis says that Swensen uses, “A carefully constructed, rigorously tested portfolio structure and decision-making process that are clearly defensive.” This one should be a no-brainer, but I’m always amazed at the amount of “trust-me” or “gut instinct” decisions that pass for a legitimate process in the investment business.

2. A team effort. Swensen (deservedly) gets all the credit, but Ellis makes the point that it wouldn’t be possible without a strong team behind him: “…the rich culture of professional respect and personal affection that bonds so many talented and committed individuals into a superbly effective team whose collective efforts excel.” Swensen gets the most out of his team by trusting them and ignoring the standard office politics or positioning that ruin so many organizations from within. This is also important for the continuity of the fund going forward.

3. Professional respect. The respect and trust extends beyond the team members of Yale’s investment office to their third party outside money managers. It’s a give and take as Swensen always looks to help others who are more than willing to reciprocate. People are actively looking for ways to help him and his team.

4. A focus on the client. “Swensen & co. are extraordinarily thoughtful about their engagement with their client, Yale University.” In addition to the typical portfolio management responsibilities that come with running a large endowment fund, Swensen devotes much of his time thinking about the best interests of the institution, including their long-term goals and spending needs. Focusing on your client’s needs should always be job number one, but it’s something that is often overlooked in the mainly sales-first, client-second financial industry.

5. Personal respect and affection. Ellis claims this may be the most important secret to Yale’s success: “Visitors to Yale’s Investment Office are invariably impressed by the open architecture and informal ‘happy ship’ climate that is almost as obvious as the disciplined intensity with which the staff work at their tasks and responsibilities.” The outcome of creating an inviting organizational culture is happier employees, which means very low turnover in staff. I’m always amazed when companies don’t go out of their way to create a workplace where people actually want to work.

6. Integrity. “There’s more money than certified talent in the world of investing, so outstanding investment managers have many choices because so many investors want to be their clients. Given their freedom of choice, managers prefer to work for and with clients they like and admire, and they like and admire David Swensen very much.” This one may seem obvious — of course money managers want to work Swensen — but Ellis makes the Darwinian point that social desirability trumps competitive strength in this case.

Countless professional investors and organizations have tried to crack the code over the years to be able to replicate the Yale model with their own portfolio. I’m always skeptical because in some ways it’s like an individual investor trying to replicate Buffett’s success at Berkshire Hathaway. It’s never going to happen.

Few investment organizations in the world could ever come close to matching Yale’s investment performance over the long-term (I’ll try to cover these reasons in a future post). And those who try are always looking in the wrong place. They want to know how to pick the best money managers like Yale does, how to structure their portfolio just like Swensen or how to match his returns.

These copycat institutions have it all backwards. They want all the answers but they’re not even asking the right questions. They’re all looking for the tactics to employ without first making sure they have the correct organizational culture in place. There’s no way that Swensen would have enjoyed the same type of success without creating the right atmosphere from the start. He has the support of his University. He has an investment committee that trusts his judgment and allows him to do his job without the shackles of short-term performance concerns.

Although it may seem odd to some that Ellis described so many non-investment related reasons to define Swensen’s success over the years, it’s those intangibles that have made the biggest difference. I also find it interesting that Ellis is one of the foremost proponents for simple investment strategies for nearly everyone else besides Yale. He knows what it takes to produces the kinds of performance numbers Swensen has put up over the years and understands that it’s not something that can be replicated elsewhere.

Further Reading:
Understanding Business Risk


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Gregory commented on Sep 09

    Trying to replicate the succesful investors is a loser’s game. I think Charles Ellis agree with me:). If You don’t know Your limits You are not able to exploit Your possibilities.

    • Ben commented on Sep 09

      Agreed. Something that highly competitive, well-educated people in the world of finance have a very difficult time doing.

  2. 10 Wednesday AM Reads | The Big Picture commented on Sep 09

    […] to Volatility May Have Deepened It (NYT) • 6 Reasons For David Swensen’s Success at Yale (A Wealth of Common Sense) • and now, a brief rant about historic valuation (TRB) • Bullion Direct vault of precious […]

  3. 6 Reasons for David Swensen’s Success at Yale | Ned Hawley commented on Sep 09

    […] Personal respect and affection. Ellis claims this may be the most important secret to Yale’s success: “Visitors to Yale’s Investment Office are invariably impressed by the open architecture and informal ‘happy ship’ climate that is almost as obvious as the disciplined intensity with which the staff work at their tasks and responsibilities.” @ A Wealth of Common Sense […]

  4. Reed Schrichte commented on Sep 09

    Mr. Piketty has a different take such “success”. Furthermore, “A carefully constructed, rigorously tested portfolio structure and decision-making process that are clearly defensive.” …in so many words, his main task is to avoid screwing up; granted, no trivial task, but not of the same magnitude as a Steve Jobs starting in his garage and Tim Cook taking the helm of a Leviathan.

  5. Bogle vs. Golitath commented on Feb 29

    […] There’s an old saying that, “nothing fails on Wall Street like success.” The Yale Model may be a victim of its own […]