Some Stocks Don’t Come Back

“If every stock you own is on the new high list, you’re a momentum guy. If every stock you own is on the new low list, you’re out of business.” – Leon Cooperman

Mean reversion is one of the most powerful forces in all of finance. Above average performance is eventually followed by below average performance. Good times can lead to bad times and the best time to invest is during the bad times.

But this concept is generally reserved for the broader markets, not individual stocks. The problem with ‘buy when there’s blood in the streets’ is that sometimes individual stocks don’t come back from the dead.

Although the market was spitting out tons of value during the financial crisis, not everything available at fire-sale prices worked out. I remember a portfolio manager friend of mine told me he was buying American International Group (AIG) hand over fist when it hit a few bucks a share. “All it has to do is come back half way to the prior peak and I’ll be rich.”

You can see this strategy didn’t work out that well:

AIGThe same thing happened to a number of well-know financial stocks, including Bank of America (BAC):

Citigroup (C):


And Fannie Mae (FNMA):


One of the most common behavioral biases when buying individual stocks is anchoring to previous levels or the purchase price of a stock. The first thing investors do when researching a stock is pull up a historical chart of past prices. The fact that a company traded for a certain price in the past gives investors a false sense of hope that it will automatically go back to that previous price point. Sometimes this works, but trying to catch a falling knife can be a dangerous strategy if you don’t know what you’re doing.

My friend Michael Batnick shared some great statistics on individual stocks a couple of weeks ago that puts this into perspective from the standpoint of the overall market:

Using a universe of Russell 3000 companies since 1980, roughly 40% of all stocks have suffered a permanent 70%+ decline from their peak value. Looking at the table below, we see that nearly sixty percent of Tech companies have had a catastrophic loss, which they define as “a 70% decline from peak value with minimal recovery.”dont com back

Averaging down in a losing stock sounds like a great strategy in theory. And it is, assuming you have a good idea about the future prospects of the business in question and are fairly certain the market is undervaluing the company. Stating the obvious, this is not an easy task.

Be fearful when others are greedy but make sure you understand what you’re buying into.

The risk of concentrated portfolios (Irrelevant Investor)


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. PK commented on Sep 25

    Some scary charts there – and a reasonable warning that if you choose to pick individual stocks you should at least pause for a second before deciding to automatically reinvest dividends and/or DCA. That’s more of an indexing game.

    Although, if your friend did call the bottom on some of those stocks, he at least made some money back… of course, at greater risk than just buying SPY.

    • Ben commented on Sep 25

      Right, from a very low base some of these could actually have been a good buy for a quick trade. Unfortunately, I think most people mistimed it by getting in too early and out too early to get those big bounces.

  2. World chart show 40/14 | My Blog commented on Sep 30

    […] Most of the time we hear that the stock market is the best asset for the long term. But we have to count with one thing. Not too many companies make it to the top. Most of the companies never grow. We mostly speak about S&P 500, but not about stocks, which were removed from the index or never made it to the index. And there is lot of stocks like that. Here I quote Michael Batnick from JP Morgan (via A Wealth Of Common Sense) […]

  3. Eric commented on Sep 30

    You’re describing the majority of FAIRX’s holdings.

    • Ben commented on Sep 30

      I suppose it all depends on the prices that Berkowitz paid for these stocks. Could still be decent investments at the right price. You never know.