Where Do Stocks Go From Here?

“I skate to where the puck is going not where it has been.” – Wayne Gretsky

I just wanted to share a few pieces of interesting data I came across this week to put the current state of the markets into context.

The first table from The Capital Speculator gives you a sense of how the various markets and asset classes have performed this year through the beginning of August.

You can see that US stocks are the clear winner thus far. Bonds, emerging markets and commodities are all lagging or in negative territory.

The logical follow-up questions for investors in US stocks would be: Are we headed for a fall or will the good times continue?

Here’s another table, this one from Shaeffers, that gives you some historical context for this question:

These tables show the largest year to date gains through August 5 for the S&P 500, Dow Jones and Nasdaq for the stated time frames.

They say history doesn’t repeat, but it often rhymes.  If that’s the case, stocks could go either way from here.

Large gains often lead to momentum that carries the market higher than investors can imagine. But all good things must come to an end as markets can’t go up in a straight line forever.

Stocks average a 10% correction about once a year and it’s been about 14 months since we’ve had one, so don’t be surprised if there is some turbulence ahead.  That’s not a forecast, just a historical context.

You should never be surprised when stocks go down because that’s just what they do sometimes.  Preparing yourself ahead of time is a good exercise for when it actually happens.

There’s no need to take gains every time the market rises, but it helps over time to take some and readjust your portfolio occasionally.

Jeff Saut, from Raymond James, had an interesting analogy on this subject in his commentary this week called the ‘1 chip rule’ that’s based on an old gambling maxim. I’ll let him explain:

The ‘1 chip rule’ basically says that for every 10 chips you accumulate, you pocket 1 to pay yourself. In investing, the corollary is to take some profits as your investments run up higher.

That’s a pretty good explanation of a systematic rebalancing policy. Having a rebalancing policy in place within a defined asset allocation takes away the need to know what the markets are going to do from here.

Until I find a better way of implementing a long-term plan, that’s what I will continue to do. That way I don’t have to predict the next move up or down in the market.  I can use the moves in the market to my advantage, one way or another.

The Capital Speculator
Schaeffer’s Trading Floor
Raymond James

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. MG commented on Aug 10

    Hello Common Sense,
    Enjoy reading your thoughtful posts. I am somewhat confused by the Shaeffers charts. Why only a selective list of years? For all I know, the Return Rest of Year is actually higher than Return Through Aug 5 for the years not shown. Please clarify.


    • Ben commented on Aug 10

      Thanks for the kind words. That chart shows the highest returns from the start of the year until Aug. 5th for the past 40, 60 and 40 years for the S&P 500, Dow, and Nasdaq. And then what the returns were after those highest returns.

      So, this year the S&P is up 19.7% through Aug 5th and that’s the 6th highest return in that period of time in the past 40 years. The previous years when the market was up quite a bit through that time, most of the time there has been a follow through with further gains but there have been times where stocks have fallen after rising so far so fast.

      So it’s simply a historical look at what happens following a large stock gain in the first 7 months of the year or so. Not to say that’s what’s going to happen going forward, but that’s what’s happened in the past.

  2. MG commented on Aug 10

    Ok, got it now – thank you for the follow-up. I agree that a suggestion of trepidation may be called for.