Updating My Favorite Performance Chart

There’s a well-known story about how Daniel Kahneman got his start in the study of behavioral psychology a number of decades ago. The story goes like this: Kahneman was asked to help study the performance of pilots in the Israeli air force. The flight instructors were trying to figure out what to do about their incentive and motivation system for the pilots.

They found that after a pilot had a great flight and they paid them a compliment, the next flight wasn’t quite as great and ended up being much closer to average. And the pilots that had a terrible flight were reprimanded and showed improvement in their next flight. The conclusion was that praise for the pilots was a bad thing while punishment improved results. Kahneman looked at the problem from another angle and determined that the reason for the drop-off or increase in performance had nothing to do with the instructor feedback and everything to do with simple reversion to the mean.

Above average performance can’t last forever so eventually it will be followed by performance that’s closer to the long-term average. And below average performance also tends to improve eventually. And so it goes in the financial markets. Here’s an update of my favorite annual chart on the financial markets, the asset allocation quilt (click to enlarge):

Asset Quilt

The reason this is my favorite performance chart is because it shows how humbling the investment business can be. There’s little consistency from year-to-year as each asset class takes its turn in the different slots.

A few observations on the past 10 years of data:

  • After a bull market in the early-to-mid 2000s, commodities have been a nightmare for investors. Over the past 10 years commodities are down by 25% while they’re down 40% since 2011 alone. The fact that the safest short-term asset on earth – cash – has outperformed commodities by over 4% a year doesn’t help either.
  • Foreign developed markets (Int’l Stocks) have acted as a weight around the neck of globally diversified investor these past 10 years. It’s always going to be something.
  • The size premium has been out in full force as small and mid cap stocks have outpaced their larger counterparts in the U.S. stock market over the past decade. This relationship didn’t hold in 2014, so we’ll see if it’s a trend that is finally going to reverse after smaller stocks have outperformed handily since 2000.
  • A diversified real estate portfolio (REITs) has performed admirably considering we went through one of the worst real estate crashes of all-time in the last decade. This probably says more about the interest rate environment than anything else.
  • Bond volatility will increase at some point if we ever get that rising rate environment everyone has been predicting. But over the past 10 years the AGG has a standard deviation of less than 3% — basically no variation in performance from year to year. It’s been an impressive run for high quality bonds.
  • On the opposite end of the spectrum, emerging markets have by far the highest volatility, which is apparent from the fact that it’s been the top performer 4 times and the worst twice.

While the mean reversion that Kahneman describes with the Israeli pilots does exist in the financial markets, the timing is always tricky. It’s very difficult to know when those below or above average flights are going to take place. Sometimes trends reverse from one year to the next while other times there are long periods of over- or under-performance in certain segments of the market.

The most important takeaway I get from looking at this asset allocation quilt every year is that it’s basically impossible to predict the winner in any given year and I’ve yet to find an investor that’s able to do so.

Peter Bernstein summed up the conclusion for this table better than I could when he said, “The riskiest moment is when you’re right. That’s when you’re in the most trouble, because you tend to overstay the good decisions. So, in many ways, it’s better not to be so right. That’s what diversification is for. It’s an explicit recognition of ignorance. And I view diversification not only as a survival strategy but as an aggressive strategy, because the next windfall might come from a surprising place.”

Further Reading:
Lessons from Thinking, Fast and Slow
Unlearning From Peter Bernstein

Now for my favorite reads of the week:

Subscribe to receive email updates and my monthly newsletter by clicking here.

Follow me on Twitter: @awealthofcs

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Paul commented on Jan 02

    Great chart! Is it possible to find this graphic for a longer timeframe (even back to the ’90’s or 80’s)?

    • Ben commented on Jan 02

      See the very bottom of this post from James:

      http://www.basonasset.com/3-things-i-learned-in-2014/

      It goes back to the mid-1990s. It would be interesting to see something like this going back to the 80s. Maybe a project for another day that I’ll have to look into.

  2. Jim Haygood commented on Jan 02

    A bit more sense can be made of the asset quilt by letting similar assets compete against each other — domestic stocks vs. intl stocks, large cap vs small cap stocks, etc.

    One never catches the exact turning points. But some of these trends in relative performance endure for years.

    • Ben commented on Jan 02

      Valid point. I think the biggest problem for most average investors is that they want to only be involve in THE asset class every year. But you’re right and the glaring one in this data is US over developed int’l mkts since 2008.

      • Jim Haygood commented on Jan 03

        A model I run (adapted from Gary Antonacci’s book Dual Momentum) compares 12-month momentum on domestic and foreign stocks.

        At end-Aug 2011 it switched to domestic stocks. Since then the S&P 500 gained a cumulative 81.5% versus 21.1% for the ACWI ex-USA index.

        As of Dec. 31st, the S&P’s 12-mo momentum is +13.69% vs -3.44% for the ACWI ex-USA. So the model still strongly favors domestic equities.

        • Ben commented on Jan 06

          Nice. So you go all-in or all-out or are you just tilting one way or the other? Also, I still need to read Gary’s book, but what momentum signals does he use? Is it just relative and absolute?

  3. Brock Landers commented on Jan 03

    Many of the mutual fund companies and brokerages produce similar “jellybean” charts going back 20 years. Some add the “diversified portfolio” categaory as well that generally tracks along the middle each year and for the cumulative period.

  4. My Own Advisor commented on Jan 09

    Love the quilt!

    All the best in 2015 Ben, stay in touch,
    Mark

    • Ben commented on Jan 09

      Thanks Mark. Same to you. Happy new year.