Diversifiable Risk in Sector ETFs

Energy stocks are the big loser this year as oil continues to get crushed. The SPDR Energy ETF (XLE) is down almost 14% while the S&P 500 is up over 11% in 2014.

ETFs are widely considered to be the equivalent to an index fund, and in many ways they are, but it all depends on what your definition of an index is and what you’re trying to accomplish. Any S&P 500 or total stock market fund is going to be broadly diversified with hundreds or even thousands of individual securities. Diversifiable risk is minimized in these types of funds. This is not the case in specialized ETFs that invest in certain sectors or segments of the market.

XLE holds just 42 companies. Exxon Mobile (XOM) alone makes up almost 17% of XLE. Chevron is another 13% of the total. Both of these stocks are down double digits on the year. Of course, it makes sense that the sector ETFs would have a smaller number of holdings since collectively they make up the S&P 500. It’s just something for investors to be aware of.

On average, between the nine sectors, the top ten holdings account for 55% of the market value. The top ten companies make up just under 18% of the broader market. There’s nothing wrong with having conviction in an investment theme, but you have to be willing to deal with much higher volatility if you make a high conviction investment.

The average range of returns in the S&P 500 between the top and bottom performing sectors since 2004 is 35%. That’s a huge gap within a broad market index. That means higher rewards if you’re right but higher risks if you’re wrong.

You have to understand what you’re getting yourself into with concentrated position-sizing. Many don’t. In fact, you could argue that sector or specialized ETFs make it much easier to invest in a certain theme without having to dig too deeply into individual companies.

One of the best parts about the proliferation of ETFs is that individual investors are now offered low-cost products in strategies that would have been nearly impossible for them to put together in the past. This is a huge breakthrough for the average investor. But it really matters how you utilize the more specialized ETFs within an overall portfolio construct and whether you understand the risks involved.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Jim Haygood commented on Dec 11

    The concentration in cap-weighted sector funds bothers me too. One way to get around it is to use Guggenheim’s equal-weighted sector funds. Since the end of 1989, they’ve outperformed the cap-weighted sectors … in every sector except energy, where the cap-weighted fund won by about 0.3%.

    Of course, the equal-weighted sectors can’t match the vast liquidity of the Sector SPDRs. But their liquidity appears to be adequate for individuals to trade.

    • Ben commented on Dec 11

      True, as long as you’re willing to accept more small/mid exposure. Always trade-offs, but I like the equal-weights like you do.