Perma-Arguments

“Never argue with stupid people.  They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.” – Mark Twain

No one knows what’s going to happen in the future, especially when it comes to the financial markets. That’s why there will always be topics up for debate.

There are some people in the financial industry that look at both sides of an argument and make their decisions using realistic probabilities.  The problem is you won’t hear many of this level-headed reasoning because it will get drowned out by the overconfident prognosticators that make their forecasts with complete certainty.

These perma-bulls and perma-bears don’t like to see both sides.  They have their views and nothing you say will change them.  It’s always either perfection or Armageddon with these crowds when reality is usually somewhere in the middle.

So here are some perma-arguments on the markets from each side of the aisle as well as some that fall in the middle and get construed in a way that fits with either agenda depending on the context.

Perma-Bull Arguments:
Cash is on the sidelines.
Forward P/E ratios are low.
Low interest rates.
The Fed Model.
Stocks are down? Buy the dip.
We see this as a buying opportunity.
We’re cautiously optimistic.
It’s a second half story.
Sure the market is a bit stretched here but we think the companies we own are extremely undervalued.

Perma-Bear Arguments:
Anything from the latest Hussman weekly commentary.
CAPE ratios are above average.
Marc Faber’s latest crash call.
Did you read the latest from Zero Hedge?
The financial system is built on trust and once that trust is gone it’s over.
Our crippling government debt obligations.
Have you seen the long-term stock chart on an inflation or gold-adjusted basis?
Did you see how much gold the Chinese government is buying?
Have you seen this chart that looks exactly like 1929 or 1987?
The market always crashes eventually.
Stocks for the long run? What about Greece, Japan and 1966-1982?
Hyperinflation is coming.

Perma-Confirmation Bias Arguments:
Oil prices are up.
Bulls: The economy is doing better.
Bears: Consumers have less discretionary spending.

Oil prices are down.
Bulls: Consumers get a boost in their pocketbook.
Bears: The economy is doing worse.

Economic growth is stagnating.
Bulls: Expectations are low.
Bears: There’s a huge disconnect between Wall Street and main street.

Economic growth is picking up.
Bulls: Company profits should increase.
Bears: The stock market is not the economy.

The Fed and QE.
Bulls: Don’t fight the Fed.
Bears: You can’t fight debt with more debt.

Demographics.
Bulls: The Millennials are coming in hoards.
Bears: The Baby Boomers are going to destroy the stock market when they retire.

Market sentiment is bullish.
Bulls: Follow the trend.
Bears: The crowd is always wrong.

Market sentiment is bearish.
Bulls: Mom and pop are always wrong.
Bears: Stock up on canned food and gold, the system is finally going down.

As always, remember that the majority of the arguments you hear (mine included) have a strong case of confirmation bias.  Do your own homework when making any investment-related decisions and don’t blindly follow anyone’s advice just because their argument sounds intelligent and lines up with your current investment posture.

 

 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Retire Before Dad commented on Jun 05

    My favorite is the old 5-8% rule. On January 1st of every year, all these stock guys go on CNBC and predict where the market will be in 365 days. Most have expectations of ‘somewhere in the range of 5-8%’. Or better yet, “we believe there is a 50% chance of a year-on-year increase in the upper single digits”.
    -RBD

  2. Dt commented on Jun 05

    Hussman is not a permabear. Thats evident in his early 90’s leveraged long position. Do your homework.