Feast or Famine in the Fairholme Fund

It was a tough couple of days for star portfolio manager Bruce Berkowitz’s Fairholme Fund (FAIRX) last week. The fund lost nearly 10% on the week, with much of that loss coming on a single day. Over the past month it’s down more than 13% even though the S&P 500 is down less than 2%.

Granted, this is a very short time horizon to measure performance, but these are the kind of results you can expect with an extremely concentrated portfolio. This is the breakout of the top five holdings in the fund which accounts for more than three-quarters of the fund’s assets (via Morningstar):

Fiarholme Holdings

The top ten holdings make up around 92% of fund assets. You have to respect the guy’s conviction to put so much faith in so few names. You can’t call Berkowitz a closet-indexer like so many active mutual funds out there. But fund investors need to understand the risks of this type of concentration in holdings.

Performance can be erratic at times, to say the least.

Berkowitz was named Moringstar’s U.S. Stock Portfolio Manager of the decade in January of 2010 for his fund’s performance in the 2000s. Since then you can see how different the fund returns have been from the broader market:

Fairholme 2010-14

This concentrated style of investing is actually the way Buffett ran his stock portfolio back in the day (he’s more diversified now). But Buffett was dealing mainly with long-term shareholders with a growing capital base from his insurance premiums and other business profits. Berkowitz is dealing with mutual fund inflows and outflows, not exactly a sticky investor base.

We’ll see what affect the latest losses have on investors, but they have actually behaved themselves over the past one and three year periods. It’s the five and ten year behavior gap between fund and investor returns that has made things even worse:

Fiarholme BG

Fairholme trails the S&P 500 on a one (19.73%), three (22.99%) and five (15.70%) year basis but has outperformed the S&P’s ten year number (8.11%).

However, the longer-term track record for investors is much worse as almost half of the ten year fund return evaporates when you look at investor returns because of poor timing decisions on purchases and sales.

The stock market as a whole can be volatile, but it’s nothing like the volatility that can be seen in individual securities. The biggest risk for an investor in a fund like Fairholme is a lack of understanding in this concept.

To beat the market you have to be different than the market. Concentrated portfolios increase the range of outcomes in both directions. In the past this has led to outsized gains for Berkowitz. Lately, it’s gone the other direction.

Caveat emptor.

Subscribe to receive email updates and my monthly newsletter by clicking here.

Follow me on Twitter: @awealthofcs

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

The Compound Media, Inc., an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. David Merkel (@AlephBlog) commented on Oct 14

    Well said. In my opinion, Berkowitz does not pay attention to margin of safety, especially for someone who invests so heavily in financial stocks.

    • Ben commented on Oct 14

      Thanks David. I agree. For a value investor, he takes a lot of risk in his holdings.